天人合一在物理上有根據?1965年FEYNMAN解釋了每個電子都是一個電子可能性。

來源: miat42 2012-07-12 14:43:35 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (2951 bytes)

http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1965/feynman-lecture.html

Feynman's thesis advisor, John Wheeler, proposed the hypothesis in a telephone call to Feynman in the spring of 1940. He excitedly claimed to have developed a neat explanation of the quantum mechanical indistinguishability of electrons:

As a by-product of this same view, I received a telephone call one day at the graduate college at Princeton from Professor Wheeler, in which he said, "Feynman, I know why all electrons have the same charge and the same mass" "Why?" "Because, they are all the same electron!" And, then he explained on the telephone, "suppose that the world lines which we were ordinarily considering before in time and space—instead of only going up in time were a tremendous knot, and then, when we cut through the knot, by the plane corresponding to a fixed time, we would see many, many world lines and that would represent many electrons, except for one thing. If in one section this is an ordinary electron world line, in the section in which it reversed itself and is coming back from the future we have the wrong sign to the proper time—to the proper four velocities—and that's equivalent to changing the sign of the charge, and, therefore, that part of a path would act like a positron." "But, Professor", I said, "there aren't as many positrons as electrons." "Well, maybe they are hidden in the protons or something", he said.
—Feynman, Richard, Nobel Lecture December 11, 1965

所有跟帖: 

自己的妻子和孩子被日本鬼子殺害了,他還美滋滋的 -紙金迷- 給 紙金迷 發送悄悄話 紙金迷 的博客首頁 (83 bytes) () 07/12/2012 postreply 15:13:45

誰獲得強大,這個關鍵問題你沒搞清。為什麽要獲得強大如果你知道了自己已經是世界了。 -miat42- 給 miat42 發送悄悄話 miat42 的博客首頁 (67 bytes) () 07/13/2012 postreply 04:23:23

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”