我上麵是腦洞和胡扯。書我真的早就買了，也真的還沒讀

來源: 老鍵 於 2023-07-01 10:38:13 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (0 bytes)
回答: It's a good book. 由 寒葦 於 2023-07-01 10:35:28

所有跟帖： 

• You didn't get rid of it. That's a good sign. -寒葦- ♀ 給 寒葦 發送悄悄話 寒葦 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 07/01/2023 postreply 10:40:07

• Indeed. Where should I start from? Oh sorry page one of cou -老鍵- ♂ 給 老鍵 發送悄悄話 老鍵 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 07/01/2023 postreply 10:44:26

• Wait. Why wasn't Hawking a Nobel laureate? -寒葦- ♀ 給 寒葦 發送悄悄話 寒葦 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 07/01/2023 postreply 10:56:22

• Wei Wei is giving everyone the floor. -renqiulan- ♂ 給 renqiulan 發送悄悄話 renqiulan 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 07/01/2023 postreply 11:05:49

• Yup. -寒葦- ♀ 給 寒葦 發送悄悄話 寒葦 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 07/01/2023 postreply 11:09:47

• No one took the floor. -renqiulan- ♂ 給 renqiulan 發送悄悄話 renqiulan 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 07/01/2023 postreply 11:25:50

• The floor is yours. -寒葦- ♀ 給 寒葦 發送悄悄話 寒葦 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 07/01/2023 postreply 11:26:51

• Thank u! Hawking's theory isn't original.Should I elaborate? -renqiulan- ♂ 給 renqiulan 發送悄悄話 renqiulan 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 07/01/2023 postreply 11:28:40

• Maybe next time. -寒葦- ♀ 給 寒葦 發送悄悄話 寒葦 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 07/01/2023 postreply 11:29:37

• BTW, I like Carl Sagan's "Cosmos" better. -renqiulan- ♂ 給 renqiulan 發送悄悄話 renqiulan 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 07/01/2023 postreply 11:38:35

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！