Number wise,Bush had less deficit in 8 years the OB's 3.5 year

來源: wxc1204 2012-09-19 09:33:36 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (38 bytes)

 $4.899 trillion vs $4.939

所有跟帖: 

$4.899T in 8 good years? That's really awful! -老忽叔叔- 給 老忽叔叔 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/19/2012 postreply 09:37:05

what is "Good year" do you mean? Dot.com crashed, Stock crashed? -WXC1204- 給 WXC1204 發送悄悄話 (21 bytes) () 09/19/2012 postreply 09:39:35

Dotcom crash was just one sector, 9.11 was a short-term event (h -老忽叔叔- 給 老忽叔叔 發送悄悄話 (251 bytes) () 09/19/2012 postreply 09:56:55

OB is spending money while balming Bush's fault.Most stimulus mo -WXC1204- 給 WXC1204 發送悄悄話 (63 bytes) () 09/19/2012 postreply 09:37:48

Yes, it was Bush's fault. In economic down turn, government has -老忽叔叔- 給 老忽叔叔 發送悄悄話 (80 bytes) () 09/19/2012 postreply 09:58:42

Mind you, more than 50% people agrees with me on this :). You ca -老忽叔叔- 給 老忽叔叔 發送悄悄話 (94 bytes) () 09/19/2012 postreply 10:06:46

小布什的經濟政策也是花錢法,都被洗腦了,以為自己是發錢的救世主 -秋色滿院- 給 秋色滿院 發送悄悄話 秋色滿院 的博客首頁 (111 bytes) () 09/19/2012 postreply 10:22:40

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”