為是麽阿姆斯特朗不反抗。。。

來源: 用戶名被占用了 2012-08-24 11:07:07 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (793 bytes)

原來人家不理睬,說反毒機構是狗拿耗子。

 

http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/23/sport/lance-armstrong-investigation/index.html?hpt=hp_c1

The International Cycling Union has opposed the anti-doping actions by claiming it has jurisdiction. That position has been recently backed by USA Cycling, the official cycling organization recognized by the U.S. Olympic Committee. The cycling union said Friday it won't comment until the anti-doping group issues "a reasoned decision" explaining its stance. Armstrong has said the cycling union and not the agency should conduct the arbitration in his case.

 

 

所有跟帖: 

血中查處甾體激素,有口難辯~!~ -^3.1415926^- 給 ^3.1415926^ 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 08/24/2012 postreply 11:09:35

他可能反抗不了啊。。。。 -^3.1415926^- 給 ^3.1415926^ 發送悄悄話 (221 bytes) () 08/24/2012 postreply 11:42:46

如果The International Cycling Union不承認 US anti-doping 的指控,結果是什麽? -Teaparty- 給 Teaparty 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 08/24/2012 postreply 11:57:42

The key is his reputation,no hero anymore -wxc1204- 給 wxc1204 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 08/24/2012 postreply 12:29:22

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”