蘿卜絲 didn't make verdict correctly

來源: wxc1204 於 2012-07-02 07:57:56 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (306 bytes)
回答: WSJ: GOP's New Health-Law Front 由 用戶名被占用了 於 2012-07-02 07:15:07

As justice, if he thought it should be tax while the law doesn't say it is tax, the law shouldn't be held. 

   Just like John Edwords' case, the prosecuter accused he abused camping fund, but juors found it didn't, even the guy is bastard, but had to let him go

 

所有跟帖： 

• Pointless to challeng the verdict R or W. Evev Repubs respect -SJSharks- ♂ 給 SJSharks 發送悄悄話 (53 bytes) () 07/02/2012 postreply 08:06:39

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！