Court Backs Obama on Health Law
In a Surprise Ruling, Chief Justice Sides With Liberals to Uphold Insurance Mandate; Republicans to Press for Repeal
By JESS BRAVIN And LOUISE RADNOFSKY
Streaming Live: Health-Law Decision
Real-time updates, analysis and reaction on the Supreme Court's decision to uphold the health-care law. Click here to see full coverage of the decision.
WASHINGTON—Chief Justice John Roberts joined the Supreme Court's four liberals Thursday to uphold the linchpin of President Barack Obama's plan to expand health coverage to nearly all Americans, a surprise conclusion to a constitutional showdown.
The ruling clears the way for the biggest revamp of America's health-care system since the 1960s—and sets the stage for a renewed political fight over its merits.
By a 5-4 vote, the court held the law's mandate requiring Americans to carry health insurance or pay a penalty valid under Congress's constitutional authority to levy taxes. The financial penalty for failing to carry insurance possesses "the essential feature of any tax," producing revenue for the government, Chief Justice Roberts wrote.
The Surprise Vote: Roberts
The pivotal -- and most surprising -- vote to uphold most of the Obama administration's health-care law came from Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts. Read more.
But the court handed a consolation prize to the 26 largely Republican-led states that challenged the health-care overhaul—and opened a new door to their resistance. It ruled that the federal government could not expel states from Medicaid if they refused to go along with the expanded eligibility for the federal-state health program that is part of the health-care law.
The decision, tensely awaited for months, proved a vast relief to Democrats and Mr. Obama.
Speaking at the White House, the president retold the story of a woman with cancer who had to go without insurance and said, "Because of this law, there are other Americans … who will not have to hang their fortunes on chance. These are the Americans for whom we passed this law."
Live Chat Recap
WSJ's D.C. deputy bureau chief Tim Hanrahan, health policy writer Janet Adamy, and legal editor Peter Landers took reader questions a few hours after the ruling. Replay the event.
But the decision also handed Republicans a sharper message for the fall campaign: They said they would tell Americans who dislike "Obamacare" that electing GOP candidates is the only way to repeal it. What's more, by calling the insurance penalty the legal equivalent of a tax, the court allows Republicans to accuse the president of raising taxes for some.
"This is now a time for the American people to make a choice," said presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney. "You can choose whether you want to have a larger and larger government."
WENXUECITY.COM does not represent or guarantee the truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any of communications posted by other users.
Copyright ©1998-2024 wenxuecity.com All rights reserved. Privacy Statement & Terms of Use & User Privacy Protection Policy
![](http://pixel.wenxuecity.com/images/pixel.gif?refe=none)
發現Adblock插件
如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock
請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus
安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”
![](/images/abp.gif?ver=201723)
![](/images/adpuls.gif?ver=201725)