You and I are talking about different aspects and classification

來源: pigletto 於 2011-09-07 17:34:16 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (519 bytes)
回答: no, you are talking different things 由 靚女~ 於 2011-09-07 16:41:35

it's a difference between acute toxicity and long term epidemology study. that's why doctor deals with treating acute sympton of high dose poison but other institutions care more about long dose exposure at lower dosage.  Most of these chlorinated organo pesticides are thus classified as carcinogen, endocrine disruptors or something else. The reason that in the latter case they are classified as chlorinated compounds are due to the standard or EPA method groups how they are  detected and measured.

所有跟帖： 

• 你說的含氯化合物，我說的是有機磷，不是一碼事啦。有機磷也沒有你說的那個副作用。 -靚女~- ♀ 給 靚女~ 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/07/2011 postreply 18:33:08

• 這個東西在化學上叫DDVP，是氯化磷酸脂的一種 -pigletto- ♀ 給 pigletto 發送悄悄話 (52 bytes) () 09/07/2011 postreply 18:37:32

• 中國的是DDV。 -靚女~- ♀ 給 靚女~ 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/07/2011 postreply 18:39:14

• 就是仨寶說的敵敵畏。 -靚女~- ♀ 給 靚女~ 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/07/2011 postreply 18:40:01

• 我剛查過了，分子結構是完全一樣的。CAS也是一樣的，就是商品名在不同國家是不同的。 -pigletto- ♀ 給 pigletto 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/07/2011 postreply 18:47:28

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！