PERRY入圍,美國真的有救了,奧8馬下台必定無疑
所有跟帖:
• 先站他這隊,帶領群眾祈禱求雨的事先不提。 -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:07:57
• here is the best team -noso- ♂ (79 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:10:44
• 你挑1個民主黨叛徒,1個比民主黨還民主黨 -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:13:51
• r u kidding me? -noso- ♂ (47 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:23:33
• Not at all -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (151 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:29:30
• Perry-Burchman -noso- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:33:13
• better than the first one, 但都是從民主黨投誠的,背景太象.. -何大款- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:37:20
• Perry 和 Romeny 不合適,他必須選個能跟他互補,給他加分的。。 -何大款- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:34:53
• 哀!這種常識他都不懂,還愛預測。:-)) -SJSharks- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 15:44:43
• 他可以跟上帝通話。 -jin_yin_hua- ♂ (92 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:16:24
• 連他你都信, 那就更沒救了 -7.5- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:11:39
• 主要是對obama沒信心。 -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:14:35
• 哈哈哈!這個要頂! -SJSharks- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:18:27
• no more radical left or right -noso- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:19:55
• 沒有救世主! 美國是否有救難說. At least -SJSharks- ♂ (102 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:15:48
• 你也不反對perry? -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:17:34
• 反對,但不象反Bush強烈. 被Cheney綁架,能力差,才會搞得一踏糊塗. -SJSharks- ♂ (41 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:25:40
• Obama has nothing to gain and every thing to lose -noso- ♂ (264 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:22:40
• True:Obama has nothing to gain and every thing to lose. -SJSharks- ♂ (191 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:28:22
• 回複:True:Obama has nothing to gain and every thing to lose. -noso- ♂ (303 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:32:50
• Easy answer: Too fxxked up to start, it takes time ! -SJSharks- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:34:52
• blame, blame, bla, bla, bla -noso- ♂ (58 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:40:12
• Yeah! Taking responsibility, but also accountability ! -SJSharks- ♂ (145 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:46:07
• bottomline is -noso- ♂ (106 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:49:32
• Hahaha! All your predication has proven wrong so far. What makes -SJSharks- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:51:48
• my prediction has made me very rich, so far so good. -noso- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:53:29
• Do not even get me started on this !? Plenty of real -SJSharks- ♂ (28 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:55:45
• so what, go ahead start it -noso- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:58:43
• That is where I do not go as low as U do. :-)) -SJSharks- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 15:00:22
• U right this time. U even thought Trump had a chance. -SJSharks- ♂ (144 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:54:16
• 頂!!Go Perry!! 八馬再作四年,美國那兩個AA也保不住了。。 -何大款- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:32:42
• Chicago politics is gotta go -noso- ♂ (124 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:36:17
• 你覺得現在美國總統在經濟上還應該做什麽? -7.5- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:36:22
• leave business people alone, let them do business and hire peopl -noso- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:38:33
• Business people do buz and hire based on market needs, -SJSharks- ♂ (204 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:44:12
• wall street is not business people -noso- ♂ (185 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:48:04
• Gee! they are the high-end business, financial business if you w -SJSharks- ♂ (51 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:51:01
• WS created bobbles and got lifeline from Bush and Obama -noso- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:54:56
• Heah right! Bush and Obama gave them load of money, cuz -SJSharks- ♂ (37 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:58:05
• they are their campaign money doners -noso- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:59:32
• Stick to your main argument please: WS R Not Buz. -SJSharks- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 15:04:49
• 好像終止富人減稅計劃他也沒實施,雇人還有個優惠計劃, -7.5- ♂ (58 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:45:17
• 要最大限度的發揮資本主義的自由競爭機製,解散工會,降低成本,讓更多的人 -何大款- ♂ (51 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:50:07
• 當效率很高的時候, 不需要那麽多人工作, 剩下的人怎麽辦? -7.5- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 15:04:54
• 樓上人不懂。真是由於有剩餘勞動力,才會有便宜勞動力。 -SJSharks- ♂ (67 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 15:20:58
• except 7.5:-) -SJSharks- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 15:21:45
• I don't think Perry would win within GOP -Wxc1204- ♂ (300 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:41:05
• Hahaha! Interesting observations ! -SJSharks- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:48:55
• you have no idea how good Perry is to win election -noso- ♂ (170 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:52:09
• 兄弟我明年也能去投下光榮,神聖的一票,就不信不能把丫八馬kick out of office。。 -何大款- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 14:59:13
• shake hand -noso- ♂ (43 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 15:00:40
• 當然,除了不合適當總統,八馬還是個好同誌。。 -何大款- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 15:01:15
• 哈哈哈!這木虛偽?大款夠格自己參選。 -SJSharks- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 15:33:15
• 哈哈哈。為大款的韌性鼓掌。 -SJSharks- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 15:03:10
• 回複:PERRY入圍,美國真的有救了,奧8馬下台必定無疑 -Longhorns- ♂ (18 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 17:12:42
• 回複:PERRY入圍,美國真的有救了,奧8馬下台必定無疑 -Longhorns- ♂ (18 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 17:14:19
• 回複:PERRY入圍,美國真的有救了,奧8馬下台必定無疑 -Longhorns- ♂ (18 bytes) () 08/12/2011 postreply 17:14:42