我說自己是top 5不完全是吹牛，again,讀數據要仔細，非常仔細。

讀數據要仔細，你們看看中醫貼那PDF得page 9, minimum adjusted income，然後再讀附注。估計這裏雙職工的都可以歸到5％，除非你象比較高那樣生了一打孩子，即便是律師＋醫生家庭，一樣歸到bottom 80%

 

The minimum adjusted income is the lower income boundary for each quintile. Because incomes are adjusted by dividing income by the square root of household size, an adjusted income range implies different unadjusted income for different size households. To compute the unadjusted income range for a particular size household, the adjusted income must be multiplied by the square root of the household size: 1.414 for a two-person household, 1.732 for a three-person household; 2.0 for a four-person household, 2.236 for a five-person household. For example, in 2007, the highest quintile had adjusted income above $74,700. A two-person household would need
income above $105,600 to fall in that quintile, while a four-person household would need income in excess of $149,400.

所有跟帖： 

• 偶一般都把自己歸到窮人的範圍~@~ -^3.1415926^- ♀ (0 bytes) () 02/24/2011 postreply 07:51:29

• 看你的皮鞋就知道不是窮人。 -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/24/2011 postreply 07:53:48

• 是啊，窮得隻剩下皮鞋啦~@~ -^3.1415926^- ♀ (0 bytes) () 02/24/2011 postreply 07:56:33

• 什麽時候貼了片片了？ -7.5- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/24/2011 postreply 07:59:05

• 某日，她貼了皮鞋＋大腿＋小腿＋肉色襪。。。 -用戶名被占用了- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/24/2011 postreply 08:00:44

• 添油加醋大王~@~ -^3.1415926^- ♀ (0 bytes) () 02/24/2011 postreply 08:02:27

• 用戶是畫足添鞋襪 -7.5- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/24/2011 postreply 08:05:00

• 派姐鐵鍋站在樹下的全是照，沉魚落雁 -豪客來2010- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/24/2011 postreply 08:18:48

• 全身照 -豪客來2010- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/24/2011 postreply 08:19:14

• 這個完全屬實，我給作證 -祖傳中醫688- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/24/2011 postreply 08:23:01

• I agree with you. -shortstop- ♂ (124 bytes) () 02/24/2011 postreply 08:07:47

• Look at the chart again -planojw- ♂ (909 bytes) () 02/24/2011 postreply 08:20:57

• I saw the detailed income table from Decennial Census 2000 -shortstop- ♂ (69 bytes) () 02/24/2011 postreply 08:45:00