前公司挨踢部門加強安全，公司有需要的雇員全部配備愛瘋，取替少數以前配備的安卓，不再配備安卓瘋。愛瘋的安全性是比較堅強的。有需要的雇員一般是頭頭，和ON Call 職能的。實際上RTO的安排下，幾乎所有的雇員到變成ON CALL了。因工作時間你必須保持在線 ON Line，就是你的工作電腦/手機必須開通的，有電郵或短信必須及時回複。公司慣例早晨9-10點鍾前需要ON Line 有個動靜，否則中午12點前不吭聲的在家辦公雇員的要啟動HR執行WELL CHECK程序。因為近2-3年有3位450+歲的同事S在了家裏。有位未婚單身男一周後才被HR 通知他外城的姐姐報警WELL CHECK發現。這個一般是要盡量先通知家人親友。實在不通時HR才最後直接報警。所以可能是幾天的時間。另外1男1女是同住的家人發現的。40多歲的女的因為不到50，她的退休金貢獻是不能被家人拿回來的。但應該沒有多少錢。有3倍（或自費升級到5倍）50萬頂的生命保險留給受益（家）人。
扯遠了，回歸技術正題。例如安卓/三星銀河有一個Extend Unlock功能，用戶可選擇設置的藍牙耳機或運動手表鏈接時自動解鎖，繞過更安全指紋和臉譜解鎖（Finger Print / Face ID）。也就是說你聽這個耳機，或使用這個運動表時，手機是解鎖狀態的4小時，可以直接查看。
這顯然是有安全的漏洞的。但是在某些戶外運動時時Extend Unlock功能很有幫助的靈活。如跑步或自行車時查看地圖路徑Trail map，指紋解鎖會受到汗液或痕跡的幹擾，臉譜也受到太陽鏡和或頭盔的幹擾。不是說就不工作了。擦幹一下手指再指紋解鎖，摘下太陽鏡和或頭盔再麵相解鎖，還是完全工作的。不方便，基本上你需要停下來站穩查看。
愛瘋為了確保安全，不提供這個“靈活”。
However, based on Apple's long-standing policies and the current state of iOS, the direct answer is:
No, it is extremely unlikely that the iPhone 17 (or any iPhone in the near future) will have an "extended unlock" feature like many Android phones.
Here’s a detailed breakdown of why:
1. The Fundamental Difference: "Extended Unlock" vs. "On-Device Intelligence"
-
On Android: Features like "Extend unlock" or "Smart Lock" allow you to bypass the lock screen under certain conditions (like being at a trusted location or connected to a trusted device). This is a convenience feature that temporarily disables core security.
-
On iPhone (iOS): Apple's approach is different. Instead of bypassing the lock screen, it uses on-device intelligence to make security less intrusive while keeping it always active. The phone is never truly "unlocked."
-
iOS 16 and later: Features like "Face ID with a Mask" and unlocking while lying down improve convenience without disabling the lock screen.
-
iOS 18's New Feature (Expected Fall 2024): A feature tentatively called "Unlock and Stay Unlocked" has been discovered in beta versions. This is the closest an iPhone may get. It appears to allow the phone to remain unlocked only when it is stationary, on a known surface (like a desk at home or office), and in a familiar location. The moment you pick it up to move, it would immediately re-lock. This keeps security as the top priority.
2. Apple's Philosophy on Security
Apple places a very high priority on user privacy and security. The secure enclave (the chip that handles biometric data) is designed to require authentication for accessing most sensitive data. Introducing a feature that bypasses this based on potentially spoofable signals (like GPS location or Bluetooth) would be a significant departure from their "security-first" design principle.
3. The "Trusted Location" Problem
Features that use GPS for a "trusted location" are notoriously unreliable. GPS signals can be weak, spoofed, or have a wide radius, making it a security risk Apple has been unwilling to take.
Comparison Table
Conclusion
While the iPhone 17 will undoubtedly have new features, a direct clone of Android's "Extend Unlock" is not one of them. You should expect Apple to continue its path of enhancing convenience within its strict security model, likely with more intelligent contextual awareness like the "Unlock and Stay Unlocked" feature rumored for iOS 18, rather than a full bypass of the lock screen.
