關注一下這個氣象學家

https://twitter.com/wildweatherdan?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor

Dan Satterfield

Meteorologist for 42 years. Fellow of the American Meteorological Society. B.S Atmos. Physics M.S. Earth Sci. RT= Noticed only. Stood at the S. Pole too.

有兩個貼很有意思：

1. 在阿拉斯加打下來的氣球，可能是美國自己的，阿拉斯加NOME上空的一個NOAA氣球，在F-22打下球的時候，很巧合地沒有了信號

2.在加拿大上空打下來的氣球，他分析了軌跡，似乎在歐洲發射的，5-7天前，飄過了中國

 

Thinking it MIGHT be the #NOME NWS Balloon that was brought down near Prudhoe Bay? The sounding stopped at 100 millibars which is early. Using 35K feet the backtrack passes near Nome. Failures of NOAA balloons happen. #ChinaBalloon pic.twitter.com/gJbtk9UL7Y

— Dan Satterfield (@wildweatherdan) February 10, 2023

Re: Object brought down in #Yukon. Based on info from the Canadian Defence Minister I used hysplit to track backward upstream. Once again I get a track that crosses #China 5 to 7 days ago. This is using the altitude at shoot down. Would vary at other altitudes. #ChinaBalloon pic.twitter.com/2rzGJYLte8

— Dan Satterfield (@wildweatherdan) February 12, 2023

所有跟帖： 

• 整天炒作氣球，真相已經不重要了。 -katies- ♀ (0 bytes) () 02/11/2023 postreply 20:40:41

• 無利不起早，炒作這個，背後肯定有利益 -又到了秋天- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/11/2023 postreply 20:46:04

• 你的嚴謹性值得稱讚。美國有點驚弓之鳥的感覺，不至於吧。中國還沒強大到到美國邊境來吧 -漢蕭關- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/11/2023 postreply 20:44:49

• 沒有驚弓之鳥，就是炒作而已。如果真驚弓之鳥，第一個氣球早打下來了，不會讓氣球從阿拉斯加飄到加拿大， -又到了秋天- ♂ (57 bytes) () 02/11/2023 postreply 20:48:22

• 高空參數對天氣預報非常重要，采集主要是靠高空氣球和氣象雷達；老打下來氣象天氣預報就瞎了 -胡雪鹽8- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/11/2023 postreply 21:08:30

• 氣象雷達測氣流雲圖，氣球測其它參數，，， -tt10- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/11/2023 postreply 22:22:27

• 先看看第一個氣球是間諜活動還是氣象活動 -周遊列國逍遙人生- ♂ (170 bytes) () 02/12/2023 postreply 03:13:41

• 測試一下防空能力，公開的間諜活動可能不大， -英二- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/12/2023 postreply 04:34:43

• 測出美軍本土防空的漏洞了：） -漢蕭關- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/12/2023 postreply 06:31:57

• 話說標準3可以打3萬米 -英二- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/12/2023 postreply 07:09:03