檢方給的不起訴第一條理由、且是唯一提到的細節：在應召上門的警察眼皮下，女子用漢語要求與劉私下談話

警察隨身的攝像機錄下了該女子與劉的普通話交談，事發當天淩晨（8月31日 1-2am）警察送劉回賓館前，該女子要求與劉私下談話。

根據檢察官發布的新聞消息：8月31日的淩晨劉強東在女事主的家中，當時她的一個朋友（同學）打電話給警察，警察到達女事主的家中、並與劉和女事主兩人對過話，根據與該女子的通話信息，結束通話後警察將劉送（took）回了他住的旅館。當天晚上劉在明州大學被拘留。

雖然事前有朋友報警，應召的警察當時並沒有拘留劉強東，說明女事主沒有當場說有“強奸”，然後警察還將劉送回了他住的旅館。最為關鍵的是：在警察和劉一起離開前，女事主用普通話要求與劉強東私下談話。這段對話是警察隨身的攝像機錄下的，因為是漢語，一直沒有引起警察的注意，是檢察官詳細審查證據時才發現，列為了不起訴的第一條理由。

其他的證據，例如外部的攝像，旁人的證言，這些室外的證據都可以否認掉，隻要抓住底線就可以了：室內發生了強暴。甚至是當警察麵說“是誤會”（正如不少爆料新聞中報道的那樣）也可以推脫說：擔心劉的“錢勢”能吃案和報複，因此不想提告，唯獨這個女子在第一時間主動“要求私下談話”很難自圓其說，這條證據是檢察官提到的唯一一個具體細節。以往的爆料新聞中常常看到：是劉強東主動要求私下協商和解，這下證明是恰恰相反了。有了這個證據，可以合理地懷疑這名女子最開始就是衝著錢去的。

我在這裏列出明州 Hennepin County 檢察官的新聞申明的原文鏈接 www.hennepinattorney.org/news/news/2018/December/Liu-Qiangdong-nocharges ，全文 可以從檢察官的網站上查到（2018年12月的新聞） ：www.hennepinattorney.org/news/news 。部分原文如下：

... it was determined there were profound evidentiary problems which would have made it highly unlikely that any criminal charge could be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

... in the early morning of Aug. 31, a fellow student and friend of the woman’s, called the police. Officers arrived at the woman’s apartment where they spoke to her and to Liu. Based on the information they learned from the woman that night, officers ended the call and took Liu back to his hotel. Liu was arrested later that day at the University of Minnesota.

During the review of the evidence by the prosecutors, which consisted of three men and one woman, it was discovered that portions of the evidence included conversations and messages in Mandarin that were translated to English. That evidence included video from a body camera worn by the officers that captured conversations between Liu and the woman inside her apartment, and later, portions of the conversation between the two of them after the woman asked to speak privately with Liu before he was transported back to his hotel.

The substance of those conversations, along with all of the other evidence including statements from the woman and others, as well as footage from multiple surveillance cameras, do not support criminal charges in this case.

...