【《穹頂之下》 柴靜女士的中國霧霾調查 (完整版)】 ---- 及 探討



 

104分鍾版

 
139分鍾版

========================

看了一下, 看完了, 說幾句

1。 發展工業 必然帶來 人們 生命 生活 環境 的汙染, 地構資源的破壞,
2。這是個矛盾,必須解決

3。國家 政府 的整體規劃 法規的製定和執行 是個關鍵
4。總理 總書記, 尤其 鄧 胡 趙 李 江 朱 胡 溫 習 李 等人 未盡到責任,失職

5。柴靜 捅出這個問題,是一件好事兒,應該得到支持肯定讚許
6。柴靜 不是個學者 更不是個科學家,她的結論並非全部正確和完整,可以應該指出評判,但 不必求全責備
7。粗醅非酒乃酒母, 酒從醅出,喝酒莫忘醅

(題外話: 柴的這個片子 可能會得到 諾貝爾提名,至少;至多是嘛,你懂的~)

8。文化 知識 科學 是指導, 這個 認知和執行需要有個過程
9。利益 利潤 成本 貪腐 是根基所在
10。所謂近30年來 中國在人類資源 地理環境 生活空間方麵 的確是 越來越糟
為了 GDP 幾乎無所不用其極
11。假冒偽劣毒 食品 飲用水 灌溉農田的水 蔬菜水果肉類蛋類,,,,,有法不依,執法不力,虛張聲勢

12。為了你我他她的今天 和 子孫後代的明天,我們真的需要關注和 對環境保護做點兒什麽


歡迎討論, 奉還謾罵!



=================


Atmospheric particulate matter – also known as particulate matter (PM) or particulates –
is microscopic solid or liquid matter suspended in the Earth's atmosphere.
Subtypes of atmospheric particle matter include :
suspended particulate matter (SPM), 
respirable suspended particle(RSPparticles with diameter of 10 micrometres or less, i.e. PM10), 
fine particles (diameter of 2.5 micrometres or less, i.e. PM2.5),
ultrafine particles, and soot.
 

The IARC and WHO designate airborne particulates a Group 1 carcinogen.
Particulates are the deadliest form of air pollution due to their ability to penetrate deep into the lungs
and blood streams unfiltered, causing permanent DNA mutationsheart attacks, and premature death.[4] 

In 2013, a study involving 312,944 people in nine European countries revealed that
there was no safe level of particulates and that for every increase of 10 μg/m3 in PM10,
the lung cancer rate rose 22%.
The smaller PM2.5 were particularly deadly, with a 36% increase in
lung cancer per 10 μg/m3 as it can penetrate deeper into the lungs.[5]

 

 from wiki





-----------------------------

Volume 14, No. 9, p813–822, August 2013

 
This article can be found in the following collections: Cancer epidemiology & prevention & control;Thoracic cancer
Audio/Video
 
 
 
Need help playing this video?
Supplementary video
Paolo Vineis and Helga Laszlo outline the latest results from the ESCAPE study, a Europe-wide project looking at the effects of air pollution on health, which show that prolonged exposure to air pollution increases the risk of lung cancer, even at levels below the European Union limit values.

Summary

Background

Ambient air pollution is suspected to cause lung cancer. We aimed to assess the association between long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and lung cancer incidence in European populations.

Methods

This prospective analysis of data obtained by the European Study of Cohorts for Air Pollution Effects used data from 17 cohort studies based in nine European countries. Baseline addresses were geocoded and we assessed air pollution by land-use regression models for particulate matter (PM) with diameter of less than 10 μm (PM10), less than 2·5 μm (PM2·5), and between 2·5 and 10 μm (PMcoarse), soot (PM2·5absorbance), nitrogen oxides, and two traffic indicators. We used Cox regression models with adjustment for potential confounders for cohort-specific analyses and random effects models for meta-analyses.

Findings

The 312,944 cohort members contributed 4,013,131 person-years at risk. During follow-up (mean 12·8 years), 2095 incident lung cancer cases were diagnosed.

The meta-analyses showed a statistically significant association between risk for lung cancer and PM10 (hazard ratio [HR] 1·22 [95% CI 1·03–1·45] per 10 μg/m3).

For PM2·5 the HR was 1·18 (0·96–1·46) per 5 μg/m3. The same increments of PM10 and PM2·5 were associated with HRs for adenocarcinomas of the lung of 1·51 (1·10–2·08) and 1·55 (1·05–2·29), respectively. An increase in road traffic of 4000 vehicle-km per day within 100 m of the residence was associated with an HR for lung cancer of 1·09 (0·99–1·21).

The results showed no association between lung cancer and nitrogen oxides concentration (HR 1·01 [0·95–1·07] per 20 μg/m3) or traffic intensity on the nearest street (HR 1·00 [0·97–1·04] per 5000 vehicles per day).

Interpretation

Particulate matter air pollution contributes to lung cancer incidence in Europe.

Funding

European Community's Seventh Framework Programme.







 







 

所有跟帖: 

嚴重同意, 該做的事很多, 柴靜不管什麽背景, 至少由她捅了出來, 關鍵在政府下一步千萬別隨隨便便做決定 -華府采菊人- 給 華府采菊人 發送悄悄話 華府采菊人 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 11:02:20

同意! -弓尒- 給 弓尒 發送悄悄話 弓尒 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 11:04:10

中國政府已經在采取措施了,這個工作,本來就不是一天一月一年能解決的事。 -馬甲2014- 給 馬甲2014 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 11:48:16

1。沒有預案,2。立法遲緩太晚,3。有法不依,4。執法不力,5。權錢法產業失業關係鏈,6。貪腐,7。上峰不知,8。民不覺,,,, -弓尒- 給 弓尒 發送悄悄話 弓尒 的博客首頁 (6 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 11:57:30

讚丁院士! -wjsun- 給 wjsun 發送悄悄話 wjsun 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 14:19:36

讚丁院士!真正的科學家! -lidongmei- 給 lidongmei 發送悄悄話 lidongmei 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 15:59:12

中國的環境治理肯定不是柴的片子出來後才重視, 自己去想吧。 誰是第一次聽說霧霾? -WXC8E- 給 WXC8E 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 12:02:47

對, 柴前 早已有, 隻是 執行不力, -弓尒- 給 弓尒 發送悄悄話 弓尒 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 12:06:26

對啊,我也不明白這個紀錄片怎麽這麽紅火,感覺還是 -路過路人- 給 路過路人 發送悄悄話 (24 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 12:14:42

理性分析,不以偏概全,讚一個 -天愚- 給 天愚 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 13:28:11

如果人大代表和政協委員都象柴靜一樣調查,分析,研究問題,中國將向前邁進一大步 -天愚- 給 天愚 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 13:34:18

誠心 專門 探討研究問題, 和解決方案途徑步驟, 幹點兒實事兒, 才是委員們 部長們,,,,該幹的, -弓尒- 給 弓尒 發送悄悄話 弓尒 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 14:05:03

分析的非常好,讚! 也讚柴靜為老百姓發聲! -司法獨立- 給 司法獨立 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 16:54:57

非科學領域的柴女士能做出有關霧霾的視頻,應是中國人的一件幸事。她的執著和膽量,令人敬佩。現在正是代表們開會商討國家大事的好時機, -spruce- 給 spruce 發送悄悄話 (453 bytes) () 03/04/2015 postreply 20:55:19

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!