回複：看來你沒懂哦!

BPA exhibits hormone-like properties at high dosage levels that raise concern about its suitability in consumer products and food containers where exposure is orders of magnitude lower. Since 2008, several governments have investigated its safety, which prompted some retailers to withdraw polycarbonate products. A 2010 report from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) identified possible hazards to fetuses, infants, and young children.[2] Since that time numerous studies performed at the National Center for Toxicological Research addressed many of those issues.[3] The FDA has ended its authorization of the use of BPA in baby bottles, sippy cups and infant formula packaging, based on market abandonment, not safety.[4] The European Union and Canada have banned BPA use in baby bottles.

However, FDA’s current assessment (as of 12 April 2014) is that BPA is safe at the very low levels that occur in some foods. This assessment is based on review by FDA scientists of hundreds of studies including the latest findings from new studies initiated by the agency.[5] The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) reviewed new scientific information on BPA in 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011: EFSA’s experts concluded on each occasion that they could not identify any new evidence which would lead them to revise their opinion that the presently known levels of exposure to BPA is safe; however, EFSA does recognize some uncertainties, and will as before continue to investigate them.[6]

所有跟帖： 

• 引用的不對。去查哪個西藥導致的研究。FDA的文告沒提這個事。 -mikeguy- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/13/2014 postreply 04:14:06

• 那個藥廠家四五十年前就悄悄地下架了。 -mikeguy- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/13/2014 postreply 04:16:39