I think the fundamental difference is what people were fighting

來源: ZoyaWashington 2013-12-29 17:46:48 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (744 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ ZoyaWashington ] 在 2013-12-31 01:25:41 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

Americans were fighting against ideas, slavery in this case. The war ended when both sides accepted the same conclusion.

Chinese have always  been fighting against people, one group against another. For Chinese, it is never about the ideas or beliefs, it is all about personal interests. Since there is always winners and losers, the war never ends. In a way, "文革" or other form of revolution will occur periodically as the internal pressure reaches to the critical threshold. In fact  China has stuck in this destructive cycles for the past 2000 years. Honestly, I don't see any solution within Chinese system, political and cultural.

所有跟帖: 

如果有偏見就很難討論問題了 -危言- 給 危言 發送悄悄話 危言 的博客首頁 (374 bytes) () 12/29/2013 postreply 18:56:24

Which part of my post is biased? -ZoyaWashington- 給 ZoyaWashington 發送悄悄話 (755 bytes) () 12/29/2013 postreply 20:08:01

認為美國人追求理想,而中國人都自私自利的看法是不公正的 -危言- 給 危言 發送悄悄話 危言 的博客首頁 (352 bytes) () 12/29/2013 postreply 23:25:09

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”