很明顯,您根本就沒看原帖或者看了也沒讀懂。

來源: nWAY 2012-06-24 17:37:05 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1141 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ nWAY ] 在 2012-06-25 13:17:19 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

Another way of measuring is to compare China to the rest of the world’s population. To do this, the best measure is not the average as, for well known statistical reasons, averages covering wide ranges are excessively affected by small numbers of extreme values. This is confirmed very clearly by world data. Only 25 per cent of the world’s population has a GDP per capita above the global average and 75 per cent have one below it. A better, and the standard, measure of incomes is to make a comparison to the median – the exact mid-point.

In 1978 China’s GDP per capita was only 42 per cent of the median for the rest of the world’s population. By 2010 China’s GDP per capita was 289 per cent of the median.

所有跟帖: 

那些文字遊戲也就忽悠百姓而已, 自欺欺人而已, 文字遊戲不會改變基本現實: -hillhawkus- 給 hillhawkus 發送悄悄話 hillhawkus 的博客首頁 (177 bytes) () 06/24/2012 postreply 17:52:08

您連基本的“中間值”在統計裏的應用都不懂,請您繼續做自欺欺人的夢吧。 -nWAY- 給 nWAY 發送悄悄話 nWAY 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 06/24/2012 postreply 18:12:57

“中間值”, 太深奧. FL大法裏, 還有量子論, 相對論呢, 更深奧. -hillhawkus- 給 hillhawkus 發送悄悄話 hillhawkus 的博客首頁 (146 bytes) () 06/24/2012 postreply 18:22:53

中間值就是一半的數值在其上,另一半的數值在其下。中間值比平均值更能反映真實。 -nWAY- 給 nWAY 發送悄悄話 nWAY 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 06/24/2012 postreply 18:29:14

請問, 韓國的中間值, 增長了多少倍? -hillhawkus- 給 hillhawkus 發送悄悄話 hillhawkus 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 06/24/2012 postreply 18:36:42

He cannot see what you see since he has shades. 回複:您連基本的“中間值”在統計 -2544- 給 2544 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 06/24/2012 postreply 19:19:17

沒文化真可怕啊 -Powerovergamec- 給 Powerovergamec 發送悄悄話 (116 bytes) () 06/25/2012 postreply 03:47:43

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”