回複:從死人看, 64事件的3個基本倫理問題。

Good questions. 

In addition, from the point view of processure, even if someone deserve a death penalty, what was the proper procedure to kill him/her (in general: court sentence, review, execution, etc)?

In an emergancy state (if the emergancy state was declared properly or not: one other question), were there clear predetermined rules that grant the army the right to open fire in some conditions?  What were these rules if there was any?

所有跟帖: 

試著回答你的假設: -弓尒- 給 弓尒 發送悄悄話 弓尒 的博客首頁 (1098 bytes) () 06/05/2012 postreply 11:10:58

回複:試著回答你的假設: -just_soso- 給 just_soso 發送悄悄話 just_soso 的博客首頁 (2301 bytes) () 06/05/2012 postreply 12:02:39

ur ??s will be answered all when i take the chair of ~~~~ -弓尒- 給 弓尒 發送悄悄話 弓尒 的博客首頁 (3903 bytes) () 06/05/2012 postreply 12:18:35

One central question is "documentation" remain awaiting for an a -just_soso- 給 just_soso 發送悄悄話 just_soso 的博客首頁 (1315 bytes) () 06/05/2012 postreply 12:35:03

search the 2nd case, it happened ~2wks ago -弓尒- 給 弓尒 發送悄悄話 弓尒 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 06/05/2012 postreply 12:51:58

what is the point of the 2nd case? Is there any answer to my qu -just_soso- 給 just_soso 發送悄悄話 just_soso 的博客首頁 (540 bytes) () 06/05/2012 postreply 13:10:59

Please provide DIRECT answers to these questions if you know. -just_soso- 給 just_soso 發送悄悄話 just_soso 的博客首頁 (236 bytes) () 06/05/2012 postreply 13:18:58

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!