黨中央不是造謠說穀開來的殺人動機是分贓不均經濟糾紛麽？看看這個

黨中央不是說穀開來的殺人動機是分贓不均麽？看看這個

http://arabnews.com/world/article602003.ece?service=print 家屬出來說火化是經過他們同意的。而且與薄家沒有任何經濟往來。 黨中央的這個冤案要怎麽收場？ Beijing- and London-based relatives of Heywood told Reuters in separate interviews that they did not suspect foul play in his death. They both spoke on condition of anonymity. “It’s preposterous. The more description (in the media), the darker it becomes,” the family member said, occasionally breaking into tears in an interview in the lobby lounge of a hotel on the outskirts of Beijing late on Thursday. The family denied reports that Heywood was a spy and that he was cremated against their wishes. “We requested the cremation. We were not forced to do so. We have no doubts about the police report,” said one family member. He said that according to Wang, Gu believed Heywood had abused or taken Bo family funds to which the Briton might have had access. Heywood’s family members said he had no business dealings with the Bos.

所有跟帖： 

• 天日昭昭！胡溫，你們還有什麽話說？？？ -I'llBeBack- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/13/2012 postreply 20:17:11

• 這次西方媒體在薄事件上不陰不陽，特別是日本媒體挺薄很多，大概在培育中國的反對派。 -zhengcheng- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/13/2012 postreply 20:22:03

• 家屬是真願望還是被願望，你很相信西方媒體？ -zhengcheng- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/13/2012 postreply 20:19:54

• 一個死人直幾個錢？薄家早連海伍德的英國家人都買通，擺平了，何況鵓鴣開來介紹的中國妻子。 -jameslovesjennifer- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/13/2012 postreply 20:24:28

• 這個不是很管用，如果王有可化驗的東西 -7.5- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/13/2012 postreply 20:26:41

• 中國刑法規定，就算人證物證都全，沒有作案動機都不能治罪！何況沒有原告沒有物證 -I'llBeBack- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/13/2012 postreply 20:34:23

• 哪有家人死了不想有更進一步調查知道真相，即使當時沒想到，現在出現這種狀況，一定是 -WXC8E- ♀ (42 bytes) () 04/13/2012 postreply 21:21:37

• Do not 造謠 -abcdef654321- ♂ (228 bytes) () 04/13/2012 postreply 21:23:15

• 家屬出來說火化是經過他們同意的，就能肯定不是謀殺？要公安局幹啥？ -相當冷靜- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/13/2012 postreply 21:24:04

• 與薄家沒有任何經濟往來？您真好玩。看來家屬收到了極大的威脅哦。 -相當冷靜- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/13/2012 postreply 21:25:05

• 老說境外媒體造謠，這會兒又信謠了 這邏輯。。。 -抱香書生- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/13/2012 postreply 23:26:39