Then your conclusion is wrong

來源: abcdef654321 2012-04-11 20:16:37 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (540 bytes)
回答: 請勿斷章取義, 原貼中, 已經說了, .hillhawkus2012-04-11 19:27:07

If you talk about 公正辯護的環境, let check some facts:

1) Many people are defending Bo on the internet. (Are you one of them?) Some are cursing the president/chairman Hu.

2) Since there are lawyers who are willing to defend Wang in court, I think that there will be some lawyers who will help Bo.

3) No one is torturing Bo and his family members and no one is destroying Bo's house, as what happened to Liu.

So it is highly likely that Bo will get a much better 辯護的環境 than that of Liu.

所有跟帖: 

1) 和和, 黨中央關了不少網站了, 抓了上千的[謠言者], 這兒可是WXC. -hillhawkus- 給 hillhawkus 發送悄悄話 hillhawkus 的博客首頁 (228 bytes) () 04/11/2012 postreply 21:00:17

1) How do you know 抓了上千的[謠言者]? -abcdef654321- 給 abcdef654321 發送悄悄話 (567 bytes) () 04/12/2012 postreply 09:07:15

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”