回複：誰有資格享受“普世價值”-從三位美國總統的實踐說開去 ZT

"Universal value" of this thing, according to some claims, including respect for life, ah, ah freedom and equality, such as like. It is said that there is a feature of it is "universal", suitable for everyone, regardless of men, women and children, regardless of class, without distinction as to race. But this view is the following three individuals will not be approved of. They are well-known history of the United States three individuals, they are independent representatives of the United States, the United States and the United States the spirit of freedom, the three individuals壓根do not think there is a "universal" value of the so-called! In their view, to determine who was entitled to "universal values", is the most important prerequisite for this to achieve a truly "universal values." President of the United States they are three: Washington, Jefferson and Lincoln.

Washington, who does not need more explanation about the name of the U.S. capital, he will know the status of Americans in mind (at least not the capital of China known as "Mao Zedong", do not know if this be regarded as the American cult of personality?) . The commander in chief of the Continental Army, first President of the United States, a symbol of the independence movement, it strongly opposed to so-and-so the value of the "universal" to all the heads, for instance, Indians. In 1779, he directed John. UNAMSIL, Major General Levin Iroquois tribes to attack, said: "In place of all was the effective destruction of the Indians not to listen to before any proposal of peace." In 1783, the commander-in-chief also describes how this was peeling from the Indians: "From the hips down peeling, so that can create or high and long legs and boots to.".

In Washington, the minds of the Indians even "people" are not they with Tiger these bison can be skinned to reflect the record of the beast is the same. His pursuit of "independence and freedom", which is a "universal value", but in his view, the Indians are not entitled to absolute "independence and freedom", this can only be made available to qualified white people only. Here, there can be "universal" in the slightest shadow?


Jefferson, "Declaration of Independence," the author, the third president of the United States, is a pioneer in the United States two-party system is the "Bill of Rights" (constitutional amendment) of the founder, he can be a great well-known words to summarize that "the United States each a political party, all must abide by its mentor of Thomas Jefferson. ". Well, the spirit of the American Civil Liberties father, how the treatment of "universal value"? Or to the Indians as an example, the February 27, 1803 to William he was. H. Harrison, the governor said: "We will promote the effectiveness of our trade, and are pleased to see that they (the Indians --- yellow fat Note) the middle of an honest and influential people who would be best to allow the Indians ..... liabilities or liabilities of bankruptcy, which would force them to obedience to sell out the land "; it is not, in August 1807 he addressed to the Minister of War Henry. Di class letter said: "As long as we hold on the Indian tribes ax, it was extinct or, in its drive to places outside of Mississippi never before to lay down their axes."

Thomas Jefferson founded the "Bill of Rights" wantonly advocate freedom of speech, press freedom and freedom of belief, then the Indians have no such freedom? Jefferson appears to them, only to be deceived, press, freedom of the massacre. Jefferson seems to have never been as ashamed of this double standard, because deep inside he has found that Indians are not entitled to these "universal" thing, which is qualified "universal" person to enjoy, and why possession of the "provider of human skin," then?


Lincoln, the great liberation of black slaves who. How he is slave to the liberation of this? August 22, 1862, in his "New York Tribune," editor格瑞萊the letter, Lincoln wrote: "My highest goal is to save the Federation, neither is the preservation of slavery, not to destroy slavery. If you do not liberation Federation will be able to save a slave, I would like a liberation; if the liberation of all slaves will be able to save the Federal, I have all the liberation; if part of the liberation of slaves, not the liberation of other slaves will be able to save the Federal, I have to do so. ". To be blunt, if not rebellious Southern slave owners, slave control of your misery? As long as the Northern capitalists, have a pro-Southern slave owners, are a "universal", the Negro who is also the liberation of what is it?

Not only is the treatment of Negro, Lincoln treated the same as their white brothers and such. He trusted the federal army commander Sherman declared: "We will not only attack the hostile forces, but also to attack the people of hostilities, we have to allow the elderly and the young South, Qiong Han and rich experience of war are terrible harsh, so that the future of the South generations did not dare to resort to war. " Thus, the north to carry out federal troops in the south of the real "scorched-earth warfare," the destruction of all civilian targets can be destroyed (Shanghai People's Liberation Army into the self-sacrifice do not prefer heavy artillery, the United States south of the federal army but "capital" and a number of major cities into ruins).

In the minds of Lincoln, he was a firm defender of the "reunification" of the universal values, then the freedom of black power? So the peoples of the South's right to exist? Put it back, take a look at President Lincoln's willingness to give you the qualifications.

The above three, is the greatest of the three United States presidents, their description of good practice, the universal values of "universal" in the end is how to do. Zhao老太爺 This is like a mouth drawn Ah Q "姓趙you with what?", Yes ah, those of the low, low, and there is great cause nuisance to people, you also enjoy the universal values with you?

所有跟帖： 

• Good Job!Thank you for your time! -aa123- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/22/2009 postreply 23:27:50