這裏隻翻譯閆麗夢的第二份報告的摘要 Abstract，報告原文可在這裏下載。該翻譯並沒有得到作者的確認，僅供參考。
Two possibilities should be considered for the origin of SARS-CoV-2: natural evolution or laboratory creation. In our earlier report titled “Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route”, we disproved the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 arising naturally through evolution and instead proved that SARS-CoV-2 must have been a product of laboratory modification. Despite this and similar efforts, the laboratory creation theory continues to be downplayed or even diminished. This is fundamentally because the natural origin theory remains supported by several novel coronaviruses published after the start of the outbreak. These viruses (the RaTG13 bat coronavirus, a series of pangolin coronaviruses, and the RmYN02 bat coronavirus) reportedly share high sequence homology with SARSCoV-2 and have altogether constructed a seemingly plausible pathway for the natural evolution of SARSCoV- 2. Here, however, we use in-depth analyses of the available data and literature to prove that these novel animal coronaviruses do not exist in nature and their sequences have been fabricated. In addition,we also offer our insights on the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 may have originated naturally from a coronavirus that infected the Mojiang miners.
病毒來源有兩種可能性值得考慮，一種是自然進化，另一種是實驗室的製造。在我們的第一份報告“SARS-CoV-2基因組的不尋常特征表明其經由實驗室複雜改造的特性非源於自然進化及其可能的合成途徑的描述”, 我們否認了SARS-CoV-2通過自然進化而產生的可能性，而證明了SARS-CoV-2一定是實驗室改造的產物。盡管寫了這個報告或我們的類似的努力但是實驗室改造的理論持續地被淡化或被消弱。從根本上講這是因為來自自然的理論自從疫情爆發以來一直受到幾個已發表的有關新型冠狀病毒來源的文章的作者們的支持。這些病毒（RaTG13蝙蝠冠狀病毒，一個係列穿山甲冠狀病毒和RmYN02蝙蝠冠狀病毒）與SARS-CoV-2具有高度的序列同源性，並為SARS-CoV-2的自然進化建立了一條看似合理的途徑。然而在這裏我們對目前所有的數據和文獻進行了深入的分析，證明了這些新冠動物病毒在自然界並不存在，它們的序列是人編造出來的。我們還對SARS-CoV-2可能源於感染莫江礦工的冠狀病毒的假說提出了我們的見解。
Revelation of these virus fabrications renders the natural origin theory unfounded. It also strengthens our earlier assertion that SARS-CoV-2 is a product of laboratory modification, which can be created in approximately six months using a template virus owned by a laboratory of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). The fact that data fabrications were used to cover up the true origin of SARS-CoV-2 further implicates that the laboratory modification here is beyond simple gain-of-function research.
這些病毒的捏造說明病毒並不是來自自然。這也更證實了我們先前的說法，即SARS-CoV-2是實驗室改造的產物，該病毒可以用中國人民解放軍（PLA）實驗室擁有的模板病毒在大約六個月的時間內就可改造完。數據被篡改用於掩蓋SARS-CoV-2的真正來源這就進一步顯示這就是實驗室改造，而不是簡單的病毒功能增強型研究。
The scale and the coordinated nature of this scientific fraud signifies the degree of corruption in the fields of academic research and public health. As a result of such corruption, damages have been made both to the reputation of the scientific community and to the well-being of the global community.
這種大規模相互協調的科學欺詐標誌著學術研究和公共衛生領域的腐敗到了一定程度。這種腐敗不僅損害了科學界的聲譽，也損害了全人類的健康。
Importantly, while SARS-CoV-2 meets the criteria of a bioweapon specified by the PLA, its impact is well beyond what is conceived for a typical bioweapon. In addition, records indicate that the unleashing of this weaponized pathogen should have been intentional rather than accidental. We therefore define SARS-CoV-2 as an Unrestricted Bioweapon and the current pandemic a result of Unrestricted Biowarfare. We further suggest that investigations should be carried out on the suspected government and individuals and the responsible ones be held accountable for this brutal attack on the global community.
重要的是SARS-CoV-2符合PLA規定的生物武器標準的同時，它的影響力遠遠超出了我們對傳統的生物武器的構想。記錄表明釋放這種武器化的病原體是有意而為而不是偶然的發生。因此我們將SARS-CoV-2定義為超限戰的生物武器，當前的全球病毒大爆發就是超限戰的生物戰的結果。我們進一步建議應該對涉嫌的政府和個人進行調查，並對向全球社會的發動殘忍襲擊的責任者們追責。
更多我的博客文章>>>
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”
