In fact, accuracy and long-range are much better.

來源: panlm_ 2020-03-07 15:42:02 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (2066 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ panlm_ ] 在 2020-03-07 18:47:22 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

In fact, accuracy and long-range are much better.

Think about it. A DF17 supersonic missile may sink a large moving target 2000 to 5000 km away from the coast, that is adaquate to prevent any airstrikes taking off from the aircraft carriers beyong the second island chains. Thus, such a missile is a game changer - terminating any desire of initiating a war at the first time.

As pointed out by Prof. Jin CanRong, this weapon has been ready to launch if needed, suggesting that the PLA Rocket troop is developping new type of missibles for future use. That may explain why China military budegts keep increasing recently - up to 1.2 trillion China Yuan annually or equivalent to US$165 billion.

Model 055 destroyer is the most powerfull warship used by the PLA Navy. Some people talk about DF17 is equiped with the 055 destroyer, although I cannot agree with such rumor. Simply, it is not necessary because DF17 is better launched from the land - although it requires other tools to aid accurately hitting the moving targets.

Some may ask why the PLA still develops more missiles although many have alreadily been equipped like DF21D, DF26, etc. Honestly, I do not know the answer. Driving most people including those who care about China crazing is that she has such a capacity of massive production - making war ships just like cooking dumplings.   

 

所有跟帖: 

如何保證DF17追蹤,打擊移動目標? -Uusequery- 給 Uusequery 發送悄悄話 (78 bytes) () 03/07/2020 postreply 16:45:51

技術上是沒錯,但中美之間就是有太多的認知上參次不同,立場"含糊不清亅,矛盾爆發,會遠比土俄 -青鬆站- 給 青鬆站 發送悄悄話 青鬆站 的博客首頁 (290 bytes) () 03/07/2020 postreply 18:40:04

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”