兒子一年前做了一個網站,頭版從GOOGL下載一小相片貼上.
收到GETTY IMAGES 信, 這是他們的庫存, 請馬上去掉. 並交費$1000-優惠$100=900
上網看有很多抱怨.認為不合理的是
1.馬上刪除也不行. 為何不先發一警告,再罰.
2.GOOGL 免費圖片 不知是哪來的.
3.....
如不理睬兩封信後轉討債公司攪亂.
有律師寫信幫忙 $150/兩封....... http://www.extortionletterinfo.com/
有人討價還價到$600
具體可看.........http://www.extortionletterinfo.com/forum/read.php?2,287
有人找 STATE ATTORNY OF GENERAL 求救. 但不知CA如何.
有網站的DXJM要趕緊檢查!!!!
ENGLEND LETTER( NOT FOR usa?)
"We have received an invoice for £XXXX for image
reproduction - after taking professional advice we strongly dispute
this invoice for the following reasons:
1. The images mentioned are not being displayed on our current website [they were removed prior to receiving letter]
2. We have not received any communication from you regarding this
matter other than your invoice, which is against the DMCA (DMCA 1998
Section 512).
3. We have no idea where they came from (a website designer many
years ago used them) and were unaware they were not free to use [important bit!]
4. The Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (c. forty-eight) states:
"97.—(1) Where in an action for infringement of copyright it is shown
that at the time of the infringement the defendant did not know, and
had no reason to believe, that copyright subsisted in the work to
which the action relates, the plaintiff is not entitled to damages
against him, but without prejudice to any other remedy."
5. Finally:
"It is an offence under Section 40 of the Administration of Justice
Act 1970 and Section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988 to
harass of debtors with a view to obtaining payment including the
issue of letters which convey a threat or false information with
intent to cause distress or anxiety."
We therefore fail to acknowledge your letter or the invoice as legal
or lawful [important bit!]"
收到GETTY IMAGES 信, 這是他們的庫存, 請馬上去掉. 並交費$1000-優惠$100=900
上網看有很多抱怨.認為不合理的是
1.馬上刪除也不行. 為何不先發一警告,再罰.
2.GOOGL 免費圖片 不知是哪來的.
3.....
如不理睬兩封信後轉討債公司攪亂.
有律師寫信幫忙 $150/兩封....... http://www.extortionletterinfo.com/
有人討價還價到$600
具體可看.........http://www.extortionletterinfo.com/forum/read.php?2,287
有人找 STATE ATTORNY OF GENERAL 求救. 但不知CA如何.
有網站的DXJM要趕緊檢查!!!!
ENGLEND LETTER( NOT FOR usa?)
"We have received an invoice for £XXXX for image
reproduction - after taking professional advice we strongly dispute
this invoice for the following reasons:
1. The images mentioned are not being displayed on our current website [they were removed prior to receiving letter]
2. We have not received any communication from you regarding this
matter other than your invoice, which is against the DMCA (DMCA 1998
Section 512).
3. We have no idea where they came from (a website designer many
years ago used them) and were unaware they were not free to use [important bit!]
4. The Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (c. forty-eight) states:
"97.—(1) Where in an action for infringement of copyright it is shown
that at the time of the infringement the defendant did not know, and
had no reason to believe, that copyright subsisted in the work to
which the action relates, the plaintiff is not entitled to damages
against him, but without prejudice to any other remedy."
5. Finally:
"It is an offence under Section 40 of the Administration of Justice
Act 1970 and Section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988 to
harass of debtors with a view to obtaining payment including the
issue of letters which convey a threat or false information with
intent to cause distress or anxiety."
We therefore fail to acknowledge your letter or the invoice as legal
or lawful [important bit!]"
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”
