1st attorney was wrong

回答: 時間限製傻等啦2009-05-27 11:20:43

everything is based on earning ability, rather than having a job or not at the moment. thus, quitting one's job on purpose should be punished.

2nd attorney could be wrong. if your giving up spousal support was based on the fact that your ex had no earnings (which was fraud on your ex's part by not disclosing the facts), then you should be able to set it aside and ask for it. call around and find a good attorney to represent you. not sure 10k will be worth it though. attorney fee can run up rather quickly.

good luck

所有跟帖: 

Can old cat give some advices? -confusedone- 給 confusedone 發送悄悄話 (124 bytes) () 05/27/2009 postreply 13:22:48

MD,我都白說了,下次你寫老貓only,我也省事兒 -傻等啦- 給 傻等啦 發送悄悄話 (18 bytes) () 05/27/2009 postreply 13:32:26

回複:MD,我都白說了,下次你寫老貓only,我也省事兒 -confusedone- 給 confusedone 發送悄悄話 (259 bytes) () 05/27/2009 postreply 13:44:50

沒,我就開個玩笑。老貓是真的,等他的 -傻等啦- 給 傻等啦 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 05/27/2009 postreply 13:47:35

why is old cat still not coming? catching mouse somewhere? -confusedone- 給 confusedone 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 05/27/2009 postreply 16:54:48

因為這個案件應該是您與您的律師的事,老貓不想管. o.k. -單身老貓- 給 單身老貓 發送悄悄話 單身老貓 的博客首頁 (634 bytes) () 05/27/2009 postreply 18:13:58

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!