Look, then that's a little different.

It's one thing to argue that the condition precedent to an agreement is not satisfied and therefore there is no contract. But it is much more difficult to argue that your on-line authorization is induced by the agent's material mis-representation. Have you tried to deal with the airline directly? Say if you don't fly, can they allow you use the ticket within the next 12 month for less than $200?

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：Look, then that's a little different. -嗬嗬.- ♂ (306 bytes) () 05/04/2009 postreply 09:56:57

• yes, that helps. -CyberCat- ♂ (134 bytes) () 05/04/2009 postreply 10:00:02

• so do you have any suggestion for us? -嗬嗬.- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/04/2009 postreply 10:05:23

• Sorry, i just realized that it is also stated there -嗬嗬.- ♂ (162 bytes) () 05/04/2009 postreply 10:21:45

• It would be difficult. -CyberCat- ♂ (37 bytes) () 05/04/2009 postreply 10:30:04

• I will do it. I greatly appreciate your time! -嗬嗬.- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/04/2009 postreply 10:34:52

• airline company says -嗬嗬.- ♂ (246 bytes) () 05/04/2009 postreply 11:08:57

• They should have a phone conversation record, ask them to show t -hisun- ♀ (217 bytes) () 05/05/2009 postreply 13:46:40