Gene Quinn says otherwise

來源: apt 2009-04-27 19:11:02 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (803 bytes)
回答: 回複:patentablity of software in general,apt2009-04-27 17:11:54
Here is what Gene has to say about Bilski. Gene is a US patent attorney, professor, and president of IPwatchdog. He also wrote software and patented them himself and is a big advocate for software patent. From time to time I disagreed with him but on this one I had to admit he is right.

On October 30, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its decision in In re Bilski, which dealt a serious blow to software patents and largely did away with business method patents altogether, although there is still some room to receive a patent if the business process employs the use of a new, nonobvious and tangible computer system, but the protection would have to focused on the tangible computer system that employs an overarching architecture and not the process.

所有跟帖: 

這隻是他一個人的想法而已, -caliber- 給 caliber 發送悄悄話 caliber 的博客首頁 (325 bytes) () 04/27/2009 postreply 23:36:45

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”