回複：擁有槍枝, 攜帶槍支與使用槍支是三件完全不同的事.

每州法律文字不一樣，可在這個問題上都大同小異，沒有分歧。你如果有充分理由認為你或別人的安全受到嚴重威脅就有權利開槍。開槍後受不受起訴，起訴後能不能定罪隻能看陪審團，陪審團由和你相似的人組成。
"A person is justified in using deadly force against an attacker to protect another person if he would be justified to use it to protect himself against an unlawful attack and he reasonably believes his intervention is immediately necessary to protect the other person from serious injury or death."

shoot first law. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/07/us/07shoot.html
http://licgweb.doacs.state.fl.us/weapons/self_defense.html
http://www.self-defender.net/law3.htm
http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN2721289620070327
老貓對美國槍文化不太了解。守法的公民擁有槍支是對罪犯最有力的喝止，法律，民意，文化都在這一邊，我們呼喚華人英雄。

所有跟帖： 

• 嘿嘿,好一個"老貓對美國槍文化不太了解",老貓真的無話可說. -單身老貓- ♂ (102 bytes) () 03/10/2009 postreply 12:24:42

• 沒別的意思，我就是不明白 -買槍是義務- ♂ (437 bytes) () 03/10/2009 postreply 13:38:37