loophole? where?

來源: caliber 2009-02-01 14:27:14 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (682 bytes)
the money you put into the child's account mostly likely is your income, so you've already paid tax on it. the only thing that might be a tax issue is the interest generated from those accounts. technically, these are your kids' income, not yours. but if that is the case, you have to file a tax return for your kids as well. and if you claim your kids as your dependents, then they can't use their own personal exemptions.

to conclude, yeah, maybe you can save a dime of income tax by putting your money into a bank account in your kids name. from the perspective of tax law, there is no "loophole" per se.

I am not sure what is the big deal on this.

所有跟帖: 

No tax for INT under $700, and low rate after -jin_yin_hua- 給 jin_yin_hua 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 02/02/2009 postreply 11:28:09

can you point to the source of that assertion? -caliber- 給 caliber 發送悄悄話 caliber 的博客首頁 (308 bytes) () 02/02/2009 postreply 14:59:33

The INT is under your child SSN. not yours. -jin_yin_hua- 給 jin_yin_hua 發送悄悄話 (34 bytes) () 02/02/2009 postreply 17:22:37

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”