美國最高法院近日裁決嶽東曉起訴SUN侵權案

來源: AMJ2008 2009-01-05 10:40:07 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (5640 bytes)
美國最高法院近日裁決嶽東曉起訴SUN侵權案

美國最高法院近日裁決嶽東曉起訴SUN侵權案做出裁決。

http://www.petitiononline.com/ToUS_SCt/petition.html

下級法院的判決已經激起強烈公憤。

http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?ToUS_SCt&1

案件英文資料在:www.American-Justice.org




(本文發表於首頁理財·房產·法律, 已被閱讀17014次)
本文通告引用(Trackback)鏈接: /wp-trackback.php?p=48559
《美國最高法院近日裁決嶽東曉起訴SUN侵權案》共11件評論

1. 匿名遊客的評論
January 4th, 2009 at 10:32 pm

李建東大師發神功
盈啦
2. 匿名遊客的評論
January 5th, 2009 at 1:45 am

被人欺負,華人應該團結一致才對啊!
3. Ming Wei的評論
January 5th, 2009 at 1:39 pm

The case will have a profound effect on the protection of copyright including the copyrights of numerous American products worldwide.
4. Carl的評論
January 5th, 2009 at 1:39 pm

The shabby treatment of pro-se litigants by the courts must stop. Dr. Yue has clearly stated the case for infringement of his copywrite rights, and the courts must permit genuine due process to go forward in this matter.
5. George Edward的評論
January 5th, 2009 at 1:40 pm

United States District Court Judge should be removed from office for committing treason against the Constitution and fraud against the court. For denying due process at law to Dr.Yue. And other judicial crimes outlined under annotated within demanding minimal standard of conduct of our appointed judicial officers, as outlined under Title 28 of the United States code of laws. affecting federal judicial officers standard of care in the administration of their offices. 1. Secondly, United States District Court judges lose all jurisdiction over a case once it has been taken on appeal to & until such time as the judicial circuit appellate courts render a decision in writing and in the case is returned to the District Court clerk’s office. Check appellate procedures this judge should also be sued for his biased and prejudiced against Dr.Yue. Under color of law and authority.
6. Carol的評論
January 5th, 2009 at 1:41 pm

This illegal court abuse is going on all over the USA. In San Diego the courts are a mess. Allowing purjury and many other laws to be broken. What next, please allow Dr. Yue to win this case.
7. Carol的評論
January 5th, 2009 at 1:42 pm

To: The U.S. Supreme Court Justices

Dear Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., Justice John Paul Stevens, Justice Antonin Scalia, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, Justice David H. Souter, Justice Clarence Thomas, Justice Ruth Bader Gin*****erg, Justice Stephen G. Breyer, Justice Samuel A. Alito:

We are writing to you regarding the case of Dr. Dongxiao Yue v. Sun Microsystems, et al., which is set for conference in January 2009 (Information of the case can be found at www.American-Justice.org and YouTube).

In November 2007, Dr. Yue sued defendants for pirating his PowerRPC software. Evidence included defendants’ internal documents showing Sun knowingly sold unauthorized and unlimited copies of PowerRPC to others. However, in March 2008, former U.S. District Judge Martin J. Jenkins dismissed Dr. Yue’s lawsuit without ruling on any of the copyright claims.

The District Court then awarded defendants $219,949.90 of attorneys’ fees and costs under Section 505 of the U.S. Copyright Act.

While Dr. Yue’s appeal is ongoing, on December 15, 2008, the District Court issued a Writ of Execution directing county sheriff to take possession of Dr. Yue’s assets (primarily his copyrights and his family home where his two young children live), despite Dr. Yue’s request for humanitarian consideration. Dr. Yue’s application for stay at the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal was summarily denied without any explanation.

Awarding software pirates under U.S. Copyright Act would encourage infringement of intellectual property and would be detrimental to U.S. economy. The lower courts should have provided Dr. Yue equal protection as other American copyright owners.

We respectfully request that your Honor carefully consider Dr. Yue’s arguments before the Supreme Court and make an equitable decision.

Sincerely,

The Undersigned
8. Betsy的評論
January 5th, 2009 at 1:44 pm

We must abide by the Constitution and rule of law, and protect Dr. Yue’s due process rights
9. John的評論
January 5th, 2009 at 1:46 pm

Dr. Yue has the truth and should be granted justice
10. Cheryl的評論
January 5th, 2009 at 1:47 pm

Dr. Yue has a Constitutional Right to be heard at a jury trial. The corruption and judicial misconduct in the U.S. Court system is a disgrace. Big business harms the small guy intentionally, and payoffs become a big question within the system.
11. lackman的評論
January 5th, 2009 at 1:48 pm

Give Dr Yue justice
請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”