This is the worst reasoning about the whole

來源: mdgg 2008-08-30 07:55:07 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (959 bytes)
thing I heared so far -- glad she is not my dentist! She might be a good dentist to you, but her claims as you described is just, well, wrong!

1. By simply looking at those pictures she can determine those teeth are baby(primary) teeth?

2. Basic human anatomy 101 here. During a "normal" smile, one will expose about 12 teeth -- 6 upper and 6 lower. They are the frontal and lateral incisors (8 of them, replaced by 8 years old already), and the 4 canines (replaced 9-12 yrs old). From those pictures, one can see less than 6 teeth. So those girls are around 8 years old?

BTW, please tell that dentist that she might have a stronger argument if she can see a missing tooth from the pictures because that means those girls have just sheded their baby teeth so they HAVE TO be less than 16 yrs old.

To answer your question: yes, there are methods to determine a person's age -- but not by looking at a randomly-taking picture.
請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”