回複:車禍的麻煩?

來源: casinoeye 2008-07-29 17:06:03 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (815 bytes)
我在正常開車. This is wrong way to describ your driving condition. You should say something like "I was driving south bound on XXX St. at approximately 35 MPH."

一個老太太過馬路我沒有注意. You gave up yourself right here. Here you should say something like "She suddenly stepped off the side walk and crossing the street from a none-marking intersection. Before I can react, my front bumper hit her ......." Pedistrian has the right of way everywhere. By claiming you have no time to react is better than telling people you are careless driver.

When police said you are ok, that basically telling you that there will be no criminal action against you, suck as reckless driving, DUI etc....

Attorney did was a civil action. It is all about $$$$$. You dont want to look clueless.

所有跟帖: 

回複:回複:車禍的麻煩? -HSK- 給 HSK 發送悄悄話 (111 bytes) () 07/29/2008 postreply 20:13:51

回複:回複:回複:車禍的麻煩? -casinoeye- 給 casinoeye 發送悄悄話 casinoeye 的博客首頁 (91 bytes) () 07/29/2008 postreply 20:27:01

回複:回複:回複:回複:車禍的麻煩? -HSK- 給 HSK 發送悄悄話 (50 bytes) () 07/30/2008 postreply 07:50:23

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”