回複：請老貓看看：孩子騎自行車被汽車撞了，汽車走掉了

個人理解，對方錯誤的成分相當高：

第一，雖然說理論上自行車和汽車遵守同樣法則，但實際上汽車一般會讓自行車。許多人會給自行車同情分。

第二，在學校出口，這是汽車需要特別小心的地方。汽車在這裏肇事，很有可能已經違反了school zone yield rule.

第三，孩子倒了，自行車壞了，腿破了，這麽明顯的事實，這人居然跑了，不留下信息，做得不對，且明顯心虛。很難想象法官會同情他。

In any case, I think you can consult a lawyer, see if you have a case. Many lawyers can tell you their assessment quickly through a (often free) initial consulting. If you have a case, you can use those "no fee if doesn't win the case" lawyers. If the consensus is that you don't have a case after asking a few lawyers, then you know you've done your best. It sounds that your main goal is justice instead of money. It'll feel bad to let this guy get away without even trying to bring justice to him.