回複:對不起沒看懂,能給解釋一下嗎?

來源: justLook 2008-05-04 12:33:31 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (482 bytes)
回答: It would be illegal if they declaredjustLook2008-05-04 12:23:43
I was response to the post above. The post was saying depends on if you declared. That does not make sense. That is, if you declared you have more than $10,000 when you enter to USA, nobody can take your money away.

How much did you declare when you enter? You may only responsible for the portion you did not declare. The most you get is losing that money. You are not US citizen, nothing else can happen to you. They have to return the part you did not declare back to you.

所有跟帖: 

回複:回複:對不起沒看懂,能給解釋一下嗎? -跳進黃河能洗清嗎- 給 跳進黃河能洗清嗎 發送悄悄話 (13 bytes) () 05/04/2008 postreply 12:38:49

回複:回複:回複:對不起沒看懂,能給解釋一下嗎? -跳進黃河能洗清嗎- 給 跳進黃河能洗清嗎 發送悄悄話 (36 bytes) () 05/04/2008 postreply 12:39:45

This is good. -justLook- 給 justLook 發送悄悄話 (116 bytes) () 05/04/2008 postreply 12:43:15

回複:This is good. -跳進黃河能洗清嗎- 給 跳進黃河能洗清嗎 發送悄悄話 (29 bytes) () 05/04/2008 postreply 14:53:44

你什麽時候 declared? -caliber- 給 caliber 發送悄悄話 caliber 的博客首頁 (188 bytes) () 05/04/2008 postreply 12:58:55

回複:你什麽時候 declared? -跳進黃河能洗清嗎- 給 跳進黃河能洗清嗎 發送悄悄話 (87 bytes) () 05/04/2008 postreply 14:57:28

真的是很奇怪 -caliber- 給 caliber 發送悄悄話 caliber 的博客首頁 (140 bytes) () 05/04/2008 postreply 15:12:47

回複:真的是很奇怪 -跳進黃河能洗清嗎- 給 跳進黃河能洗清嗎 發送悄悄話 (11 bytes) () 05/04/2008 postreply 15:42:22

You should have declared the whole amount -curiousGeorge2- 給 curiousGeorge2 發送悄悄話 (47 bytes) () 05/05/2008 postreply 12:23:11

回複:You should have declared the whole amount -跳進黃河能洗清嗎- 給 跳進黃河能洗清嗎 發送悄悄話 (86 bytes) () 05/05/2008 postreply 12:52:41

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”