Part two: non-party discovery

來源: apt 2007-07-17 13:07:54 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (533 bytes)
Non-party discovery, is when the lawyer sent the letter directly to your parents to request production of such evidence.

Again, according to FRCP, the lawyer has the subpoena power to do so. Typically non-party can object such request by written notice on basis of privilege. For other grounds, the non-party must file a timely motion to the court issuing the subpoena to challenge such request, either on basis of undue burden/cost which outweighs relevance, or that the information is not under the non-party's control.

所有跟帖: 

I think 反受其亂 needs a lawyer. -Comfort.- 給 Comfort. 發送悄悄話 (50 bytes) () 07/17/2007 postreply 16:09:56

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”