"Car Accident" Continued - Responding to "N"

來源: 望海潮 2007-05-11 21:58:35 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1115 bytes)
1) Yes, I've put my car in the "D"drive to go forward. I do need to step on the break to switch gears for my car, so my car was indeed no longer moving backwards.

2) My neighbor did not back onto his driveway. He drove forward into his driveway.

Over the last couple of days, I had plenty of time to analyze the corner of our street. I've got what I think is good evidence that if he indeed just finished pulling out of his garage, as he claimed, it is impossible for his car to be behind me. Further more, if he was indeed pulling out, our car has no chance to collide when he drives forward to avoid me. The damage to my car clearly indicated that the impact started from behind my car to the rear right bumper, supporting my observation that he was headed right into the cul-de-sac, rather than heading out, as he claimed. To my eyes, the damages on both cars also indicate that I did not back into him, but rather, he miscalculated his clearance and hit me when he drove through behind me.

I will put up follow-up posts after talking to my insurance company if anyone is interested.

所有跟帖: 

To 單身老貓 -望海潮- 給 望海潮 發送悄悄話 (250 bytes) () 05/11/2007 postreply 22:11:30

很抱歉,您的問題,老貓現在沒有任何意見 ! -單身老貓- 給 單身老貓 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 05/12/2007 postreply 11:44:21

回複:"Car Accident" Continued - Responding to "N" -N.- 給 N. 發送悄悄話 (177 bytes) () 05/12/2007 postreply 01:17:45

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”