補充一下, 回複:有關司法精神精神醫學

來源: SoLucky 2007-03-14 15:09:31 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (688 bytes)
Under the US law, intoxication by medication is a defense only if it negates the "intent" element of the crime. In this case, the question would be, under the prescribed medication, which is a kind of involuntary intoxiction, did he possess the intent to commit the crime. If he were so heavily medicated that he didn't know what he was doing, then he would not be guilty of larceny. However, from what we heard, it completely doesn't sound like the old man was so dizzy woozy that he took the things unintentionally or by mistake. It was clear that he wanted to steal and not to pay. So in this regard, his medication wouldn't help him at all. This is so despicable and disgusting.
請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”