不告而取不一定就是偷 --- 這就是美國的法律 -- 信不信由你

來源: 昭君出塞因地製宜 2006-09-26 11:48:25 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (436 bytes)
小婦人沒有隱瞞的意思。偷(分好幾種)在美國法律下的定義包括至少兩個因素:(1)taking the object and (2) a motive (intention) -- not to repay. If 小婦人's daughter's motive is to (1) get debt paid or (2) will repay the neighbour later, then there cannot be a conviction of 偷 under any state law.

Believe it or now, if you take your neighbour's car in the morning and return it a few days later, it is not a larceny or theft.
請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”