回複:請教老貓

An immigration lawyer would be more suitable to answer your question. Just another thought, if you can not dispute the evidence itself, can you dispute how the evidence was collected?

所有跟帖: 

回複:回複:請教老貓 -help_2006- 給 help_2006 發送悄悄話 (68 bytes) () 07/22/2006 postreply 17:56:36

回複:回複:回複:請教老貓 -selfselfself- 給 selfselfself 發送悄悄話 (190 bytes) () 07/22/2006 postreply 18:11:08

回複:回複:回複:回複:請教老貓 -help_2006- 給 help_2006 發送悄悄話 (68 bytes) () 07/22/2006 postreply 18:40:40

回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:請教老貓 -單身老貓- 給 單身老貓 發送悄悄話 (378 bytes) () 07/22/2006 postreply 21:01:29

回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:請教老貓 -help_2006- 給 help_2006 發送悄悄話 (281 bytes) () 07/22/2006 postreply 21:54:02

回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:請教老貓 -selfselfself- 給 selfselfself 發送悄悄話 (227 bytes) () 07/22/2006 postreply 22:03:30

回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:回複:請教老貓 -help_2006- 給 help_2006 發送悄悄話 (251 bytes) () 07/22/2006 postreply 22:28:21

回複: -huaipiqi- 給 huaipiqi 發送悄悄話 (87 bytes) () 07/23/2006 postreply 05:55:32

回複:回複: -help_2006- 給 help_2006 發送悄悄話 (38 bytes) () 07/23/2006 postreply 12:05:19

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!