回複：還是不認識的好. 因為不認識TROUT, 所以NOT GUILTY

了解了一下, 聽說說不認識TROUT, 照樣罰.
In the court, they will only stick to two points: 1)NO trout stamp, True or not? true, 2) keeping trout, true or not? if true, 罰! Now I can not do anything for the point 1, what I can only do is point 2.

所有跟帖： 

• 同情你! -Sunblue- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/20/2006 postreply 14:01:53

• 你的意思是警察沒有證據證明它是TROUT? -sunblue- ♀ (87 bytes) () 07/20/2006 postreply 14:25:58

• they took the fish , but I don't think they will keep it for ove -daynice- ♂ (168 bytes) () 07/20/2006 postreply 14:30:59

• good point:))) -sunblue- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/20/2006 postreply 14:33:39

• Hehe, don't you see the movies? -Bodd- ♀ (251 bytes) () 07/21/2006 postreply 00:38:15

• And then they eat the fish. LOL -沉吟至今- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/21/2006 postreply 09:31:29