回複:請大家幫幫忙,看看這買車押金還能要回來嗎?

來源: apt 2006-07-01 22:15:28 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1313 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ apt ] 在 2006-07-12 10:17:13 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.
A court will follow doctrine of caveat emptor, buyer be aware, that you should do inspection yourself to make nothing wrong with the car before you buy. Unless you have proof that they misrepresented some material facts, you will probably lose because you signed a contract and you breached it by withdrawal from the deal. They can sue you in the contract but their damage will be limited to contract price minus market price. They must act in good faith to resell the car and claim the difference. Let's say if they sold it to another for $8000, then you are responsible for the $300 difference. You will also be liable for the $300 reliance damage because they relied on your promise to buy, to their detriments. They should not be awarded a total value of $8300. If they could not resell, a court must find the reasonable market value for the car and force you to be liable for the difference, plus reliance damage. Be aware that if this is between you and a dealer, you must pay for the full vlaue of the car because a dealer can claim lost volume sale.

They could also sue you off the contract under promissory estoppel because they relied on your promise to buy.

Either way, your $500 should be treated as a deduction to the damage and if the damage is less you may get some back.

所有跟帖: 

回複:回複:請大家幫幫忙,看看這買車押金還能要回來嗎? -ZZXXCCVV- 給 ZZXXCCVV 發送悄悄話 (154 bytes) () 07/02/2006 postreply 17:14:29

回複:回複:回複:請大家幫幫忙,看看這買車押金還能要回來嗎? -apt- 給 apt 發送悄悄話 (350 bytes) () 07/02/2006 postreply 22:09:39

回複:回複:回複:回複:請大家幫幫忙,看看這買車押金還能要回來嗎 -ZZXXCCVV- 給 ZZXXCCVV 發送悄悄話 (162 bytes) () 07/03/2006 postreply 10:13:43

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”