這位仁兄說的差矣。builder這麽做是不合法的

如果你簽的時候被誤導，是不是挺生氣的？

我查了有關法律，builder這麽做是不合法的：

Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act 1974 (RESPA) is a federal statute enacted by the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).In Section 9, RESPA prohibits home sellers from
requiring home buyers to purchase their settlement services from a particular company either
directly or indirectly, as a condition of sale. Buyers may sue a seller who violates this
provision for an amount equal to three times all charges made for the title insurance.

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：這位仁兄說的差矣。builder這麽做是不合法的 -單身老貓- ♂ (1253 bytes) () 05/24/2006 postreply 08:23:49

• 後續報道：builder已經同意我們用自己的title company -瑞雪花園- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/26/2006 postreply 07:54:40

• 謝謝你的反饋！象你這樣做的人現在還不多，希望以後越來越多的人能夠 -Bodd- ♀ (142 bytes) () 05/26/2006 postreply 12:21:38

• 按照你的情況，他們確實不是必須滿足你的要求。可見好人有好報。 -Bodd- ♀ (144 bytes) () 05/26/2006 postreply 12:28:29