it's a common practice

來源: selfselfself 2006-04-24 19:42:16 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (928 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ selfselfself ] 在 2006-05-04 22:34:43 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.
Lawyer usually takes 1/3 of the final settlement. It's called contingent fee. That is why your lawyer wants to make sure that the landlord still have something valuable. If your landlord has 0, then 1/3 of 0 is still 0. Then your lawyer won't waste time to sue your landlord. Lawyer doesn't work for free, they have to make sure they get something before they take your case. This is also reasonable for you. Because lawyers can not gurantee they can win. Good lawyer has better chance to win. If they lose the case, they don't get paid, right? If any lawyer wants to charge you an hourly fee in this case, you definitely should stay away. After the agreement is signed, everything between you and your lawyer is governed by the agreement. There is no point to suspect if they are lying or not now. The landlord deals with his lawyer, he pays his lawyer to defend his case. You have nothing to do with his lawyer.

所有跟帖: 

回複:it's a common practice -鈺飛- 給 鈺飛 發送悄悄話 (62 bytes) () 04/25/2006 postreply 17:43:40

Usually not. -Bodd- 給 Bodd 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 04/26/2006 postreply 09:41:04

I mean usually can't. -Bodd- 給 Bodd 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 04/26/2006 postreply 09:42:04

Your landlord can't ask for you to pay his lawyer -selfselfself- 給 selfselfself 發送悄悄話 (401 bytes) () 04/27/2006 postreply 08:01:56

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”