多謝了, shawn80! 這裏是指控的具體罪名描述CT-53a-181(2)

If charged with a violation of § 53a-181 (a) (2):

The next element that the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that the defendant assaulted or struck another. An ''assault'' is a demonstration of an unlawful intent to inflict immediate injury on the person of another who is then present; an intentional attempt by violence to do injury to the person of another.

The statute also prohibits the striking of another, that is, the intentional use of force or violence on the person of another and inflicted without the consent of the other. The term ''violence'' as used here is synonymous with ''physical force.'' A defendant may be liable for striking another where the force or violence is applied through some intervening agency that he has put in motion as, for example, intentionally throwing an object that strikes another person. The striking must be accompanied with an intent to do harm, although it is not necessary that any actual harm resulted from the unlawful act.

The two offenses prohibited under this section are worded in the disjunctive, that is, assaults, ''or'' strikes another. While frequently the assault and striking exist together, the acts or conduct constituting ea