給您一個比較好玩的案例，1885 年 在麻薩諸塞州，(Wilkins v. Jewett139 Mass. 29, 29 N.E. 214Mass. 1885.)的case 中
的決定是應該由您的鄰居與您平分所有的開銷
原判決主文摘要如下
providing that every person building with brick or stone in Boston shall have liberty to set half his
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
partition wall on his neighbor's ground, and that when
＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾
such neighbor shall build he shall pay for one-half the partition wall, so far as it shall be built against, is unconstitutional, in that it denies the right of trial by jury.
但是在1889年Heine v. Merrick41 La.Ann. 194, 5 So. 760
La. 1889Jan 07, 1889 的案件中法官的判決是如果對方要重新建一堵較厚的牆，則超出原有地界的部份必須在他的那一方，同時對方必須支付所有extra的費用
原來判決主文摘要如下
The right to build a thicker wall, under Civ.Code, art. 682 (LSA-C.C.), includes the right to rest it on the center of a sufficient foundation, and, although the additional thickness of the wall itself must be taken from his own soil, the foundation must necessarily extend equally on each side from the center of the wall.
所以結論是，你們必須對分修復的費用
的決定是應該由您的鄰居與您平分所有的開銷
原判決主文摘要如下
providing that every person building with brick or stone in Boston shall have liberty to set half his
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
partition wall on his neighbor's ground, and that when
＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾＾
such neighbor shall build he shall pay for one-half the partition wall, so far as it shall be built against, is unconstitutional, in that it denies the right of trial by jury.
但是在1889年Heine v. Merrick41 La.Ann. 194, 5 So. 760
La. 1889Jan 07, 1889 的案件中法官的判決是如果對方要重新建一堵較厚的牆，則超出原有地界的部份必須在他的那一方，同時對方必須支付所有extra的費用
原來判決主文摘要如下
The right to build a thicker wall, under Civ.Code, art. 682 (LSA-C.C.), includes the right to rest it on the center of a sufficient foundation, and, although the additional thickness of the wall itself must be taken from his own soil, the foundation must necessarily extend equally on each side from the center of the wall.
所以結論是，你們必須對分修復的費用
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”
