AGAIN, IRS, INS define PR differently. SadCity is too sturburn

來源: NotALawyer2 於 2006-02-04 15:05:42 [檔案] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀：次 (270 bytes)

2 persons have called IRS help and proved SadCity is wrong. I have read the 5 tests myself and no problem claiming parent as dependents for 5 years. Using different softwares leading to same result. I know people who hired CPA has claimed their B2 parent as dependants.

您的位置：文學城 » 論壇 » 法律谘詢 » AGAIN, IRS, INS define PR differently. SadCity is too sturburn