回複：怎麽辦？

Unconscionability is not a defense either.

According to UCC 2-102, the court can strike down a contract if it finds unconscionability in the contract formation process, that is, you are induced to sign the contract so that the dealer can take advantage of you.

I just thought about it for a while and then decided this was not a good defense. First, there is no proof you were unable to understand the contract terms and the dealer was trying to take advantage. Second, that interest rate was not a shock of consciousness. For example, unless the court finds that other dealers charge 5% and your dealer charged 13% with a really depraved heart, then the court may take action. Under the circumstances it would quite be the opposite.

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：回複：怎麽辦？ -usabc2991- ♂ (629 bytes) () 11/30/2005 postreply 11:01:28

• 回複：回複：回複：怎麽辦？ -66196- ♀ (392 bytes) () 11/30/2005 postreply 11:16:04

• 回複：回複：回複：回複：怎麽辦？ -難得明白- ♀ (186 bytes) () 11/30/2005 postreply 11:36:01

• NOTE寫清楚你說的那些條款了嗎? -stp- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/30/2005 postreply 12:48:43

• That's not law -66196- ♀ (1191 bytes) () 11/30/2005 postreply 13:23:56