I don't know if a normal auto-insurance covers real property. My understanding an auto-insurance only covers driver/passenger and tangible property in the car. On the other hand, negligence per se might be a good choice to sue. Here, the state driving code definitely lists drunk-driving as one of the misdemeanor offenses. The only problem under negligence per se is that you have to persuade the judge/jury to believe that the driving code covers damage of the house, which, I seriously doubt.
回複:夜驚魂,HOUSE 被車撞,請單身老貓和大家幫忙,在線等
I don't know if a normal auto-insurance covers real property. My understanding an auto-insurance only covers driver/passenger and tangible property in the car. On the other hand, negligence per se might be a good choice to sue. Here, the state driving code definitely lists drunk-driving as one of the misdemeanor offenses. The only problem under negligence per se is that you have to persuade the judge/jury to believe that the driving code covers damage of the house, which, I seriously doubt.
所有跟帖:
•
回複:Could you please explain this sentence? I cant catch it.Th
-謝過了-
♂
(328 bytes)
()
11/20/2005 postreply
13:05:06
•
回複:回複:Could you please explain this sentence? I cant catch
-68156-
♀
(1273 bytes)
()
11/20/2005 postreply
13:43:40