Police's involvement is NOT...

來源: Bodd 2003-09-11 13:04:00 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (988 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ Bodd ] 在 2004-02-03 07:43:16 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.
Police's involvement is NOT NECESSARY.

Ev~~~ery insu~~~rance comp~~~any h~~~as i~~~ts o~~~wn inves~~~tigator.
Pol~~~ice's invol~~~vement w~~~ill us~~~ually simpl~~~ify the ca~~~se,
tho~~~ugh so~~~metimes not, wit~~~hout pol~~~ice's wr~~~itten
ac~~~cident rep~~~ort, insur~~~ance com~~~pany wi~~~ll inves~~~tigate
the acc~~~ident its~~~elf and ma~~~ke its dec~~~ission al~~~l b~~~y
its~~~elf.

Having experienced a car accident will definitely
improve your knowledge of insurance claim, but you may
still have some incorrect concept. Do you admit that?

PS. I tried to post this article several times, but
failed. I don't know why? So I post it as a new one.


我看你不是無知,就是愚蠢
文章來源: newman# 於 2003-9-10 16:15:00
到底誰在不懂裝懂,害人害己?我看你不是無知,就是愚蠢。還誠心誤導他人。
我就在美國出過車禍。我沒有讓道,把對方的車撞了一個巴掌大的坑。 雙方把警察叫來。警察一來就拿出一張表,填好事故發生的時間,地點,損害的程度,雙方的駕照號碼。警察問雙方對誰付責任有無分歧。一個星期了,我到警察局取出一份事故報告。 我把這份報告寄給我的保險公司。 我的保險公司賠給
對方900多美元。如果警察不到場,保險公司應該相信甲方,還是乙方?




所有跟帖: 

Finally... And I am sorry. -Bodd- 給 Bodd 發送悄悄話 (242 bytes) () 09/11/2003 postreply 13:08:00

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”