No agreement, no good

來源: siuc 2005-06-30 15:47:09 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (524 bytes)
In this case, it seems that both of you don't have a written agreement in hand, so both of you still have the same right and liability on everything. Please also clarify what is seperated? Divorced? and what state you are in? In community stats, all properties are seperated in half, regardless of names of bank accounts. Most northern states, however, are not among this type, but still, if you don't have written agreement of settlement, both of you are entitled to the right and the liability to the house and the loan.

所有跟帖: 

回複:No agreement, no good -實在沒招了!- 給 實在沒招了! 發送悄悄話 (31 bytes) () 07/01/2005 postreply 05:50:36

回複:回複:No agreement, no good -bigbelly- 給 bigbelly 發送悄悄話 (348 bytes) () 07/03/2005 postreply 02:41:28

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”