U R 法居士!!!!

回答: To 法居士: SeveralpointsToClarify幫友問~2005-05-18 12:49:14

Even use the same words below. There are no "several people" don't believe. It is you or that woman did.

Again, if you don't believe, ignore it. No need to argue.

所有跟帖: 

WHo r u? that woman's Lover??? -it'swhy>?- 給 it'swhy>? 發送悄悄話 (343 bytes) () 05/18/2005 postreply 13:25:54

I think so, otherwise, why so -overacted?- 給 overacted? 發送悄悄話 (1215 bytes) () 05/18/2005 postreply 14:34:13

赫赫,這裏罵人沒用,關鍵是讓那男人娶你. -旁觀者清.- 給 旁觀者清. 發送悄悄話 (124 bytes) () 05/18/2005 postreply 19:26:30

這人一定是第三者,否則貼子裏怎麽充滿了滿腔的怨氣和仇恨. -有氣找那男人撒去.- 給 有氣找那男人撒去. 發送悄悄話 (119 bytes) () 05/18/2005 postreply 19:36:18

what a pity woman,充滿了滿腔的怨氣和仇. -BianTai!- 給 BianTai! 發送悄悄話 (232 bytes) () 05/18/2005 postreply 19:41:22

你是第三者嗎>怎麽把所有反對你的貼都說是人老婆貼的. -實在看不過眼說兩句- 給 實在看不過眼說兩句 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 05/18/2005 postreply 19:52:55

這女人在文學城上過好幾個男人了.難得對這個這麽執著. -也難得這老婆這麽倒黴- 給 也難得這老婆這麽倒黴 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 05/18/2005 postreply 20:07:28

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!